Show the work.
State the limits.

The supplied November 2 strategy records 407 sent emails, 189 contacted addresses, 53 substantive replies and 30 redirects. It records no identified continuing owner for the discharge to acceptance gap.

The snapshot covers correspondence from October 11 to November 2, 2026. The underlying search included psychiatric discharge, handoff, named owner and related disability policy subjects. These totals are campaign correspondence, not 407 identical requests or 189 distinct institutions.

A substantive reply is a human answer rather than an automatic reply or bare acknowledgement. A redirect includes referrals to another office, a different mandate or the FOI process. Reply categories overlap with organizational follow up.

The hand checked total of 53 is used instead of the rough automatic tags in the email index. A reply can arrive from a different address than the original recipient.

The site has reviewed source excerpts and the campaign’s classification, but has not independently authenticated the mailbox or rerun the full deduplication and classification. These are campaign reported counts. The record is not a representative survey or a clinical, legal or national system audit.

Editorial treatment

Correspondence is summarized by institution and role. Staff names, signatures, phone numbers, recipient addresses, private appointments and personal case details are omitted. Summaries include material follow up context.

No named owner in these replies does not mean no professional duties exist. The campaign is asking for an identifiable, continuing administrative owner and an auditable process.

Source: Adam Gould’s supplied document, “nobodyownsit.ca: 48 hour recap of institutional replies (Nov 1 to 3, 2026).” It summarizes the campaign’s own correspondence and includes older October context.

The historical download summarizes the November 3 versions of entries R12 to R26. Some live entries include later correspondence. The underlying new emails were not attached to this update, so the site does not independently authenticate them. Individual email dates are used only where the recap gives them; other entries show the recap window.

The recap’s classifications overlap and are not an updated mailbox tally. The historical 407 emails, 189 addresses and 53 substantive replies remain explicitly dated to November 2. An automatic acknowledgement is distinguished from a substantive reply.

The PPAO statement is presented as its reported answer, rather than an independent conclusion about all Ontario law or every clinician’s duties. CIHI’s mandate response is not treated as proof that no data exists.

Personal correspondence and material covered by the campaign’s prior quotation restrictions remain excluded. The public download contains reviewed summaries and next steps.

This update draws on the campaign’s November 10 site audit and its dated summaries of mailbox correspondence and the send calendar. The audit reviewed replies through about 2 PM Toronto time. Quotations and dates are attributed to the responding offices. The October 11 to November 2 hand checked tally is a separate snapshot.

The audit records Southlake’s decision and the policy title. The contents of the released policy await review. The public summaries omit staff contact details, personal correspondence and the FOI decision letter.

The site’s record was updated November 10, 2026 with the latest correspondence audit. The original numerical correspondence tally still ends November 2. Later replies and FOI results are reflected only after review.

New evidence should identify the precise claim, the source, the date and what should change. The public story and contact intake will open after launch and privacy review. No submission inbox is represented as active here.

A dated revision entry will accompany material corrections. A newly identified transition owner will be a campaign result, not something to omit.